New ruling retour sur decision ?

Source Reddit MagicTCG :

Citation :

Here's the text of the new section from the MTR for anyone curious:

4.8 Reversing Decisions

Players are expected to consider their options before taking an action and players are not usually allowed to take back an action that has been communicated to their opponent, either verbally or physically.

Sometimes, a player will realize that they have made a wrong decision after making a play. If that player has not gained any information since taking the action and they wish to make a different decision, a judge may allow that player to change their mind. Judges must carefully consider whether the player has gained information since making the play that might have affected the decision; in particular, players may not try to use opponent reactions (or lack thereof) to see if they should modify actions they committed to. If the judge cannot be sure no information was gained, they should not allow the decision to be changed.

Examples

1) A player plays an Island and, before anything else happens, says “Sorry, I meant to play a Swamp.”

2) A player says “No blocks” immediately followed by “Wait, no, I block with this creature.”

3) A player says “Go. Wait, land, go.”

Phena ? Les judges ? C'est vrai ou c'est une rumeur ?

Il n'existe aujourd'hui aucune section 4.8 au sein du MTR.

Dans la matrice si...

Ce n'est pas du tout un rumeur. Ça a été communiqué sur plusieurs sources :
- Les articles de la page officielle de Magic : https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/competitive-gaming/october-magic-tournament-rules-release-notes-2018-10-01
- Le blog officiel des changements de policy que - en théorie - tous les arbitres devraient suivre : https://blogs.magicjudges.org/telliott/2018/10/01/policy-changes-for-guilds-of-ravnica/ (contient aussi la nouvelle version des MTR et de l'IPG)
- Kevin Desprez vient aussi de publier une bonne description de comment interpreter ces nouvelles règles : https://blogs.magicjudges.org/whatsupdocs/2018/10/02/reversing-decisions/

Pour clarifier, l'idée par defaut sera toujours de ne pas permettre le retours en arrière des décisions. Sauf dans des cas extremement anodins.

Merci pour ces articles.
Je suis a titre personnel extrêmement dubitatif sur cette règle, mais bon il va falloir faire avec de toute manière

j'aime bien cette règle qui clarifie les choses dans le bon sens